Are You in the Healthcare Field?

Find Out How We Can Help »
[et_social_follow icon_style="slide" icon_shape="rectangle" icons_location="top" col_number="1" outer_color="dark"]
Millions Recovered For Our Clients No Fees Unless We Win

Allegations of Sexual Harassment in the Pennsylvania Senate

December 3rd, 2018

Chester County sexual harassment lawyers report on harassment claims against the PA senate.Recently, sexual harassment allegations were brought up against the Pennsylvania Senate security force by two former female employees who provided security as part of a team of 16 employees. The two women alleged that they were subjected to inappropriate sexual behavior and lewd comments and text messages by other male members of the security force. The women also stated that they were sent inappropriate pictures and cartoons that were sexual in nature, including pictures of male genitalia.

Complaining Within the Organization

The women stated in their lawsuit that they originally made internal complaints regarding the behavior but that nothing was done by leadership to stop the behavior. There is also a former male employee that joined in the lawsuit, stating that an adverse employment action was taken against him because he befriended one of the alleged victims and because he was asking too many questions about the alleged sexual harassment. He was ultimately fired for insubordination, but the senate security force was unable to sufficiently prove insubordination at a hearing regarding that employee’s unemployment insurance. Therefore, that employee claims that he was terminated as a result of retaliation for inquiring about the sexual harassment allegations.

Like sexual harassment in the workplace, retaliatory behavior that can be linked to complaints of sexual harassment is also illegal since it is a form of discrimination. A second male employee also believes he was fired because he witnessed the sexual harassment.

A lawyer for the security force said that these allegations may be related to growing pains associated with a change in leadership in the department. The department denies the allegations. One of the female plaintiffs in the lawsuit states that she was constructively discharged because after her complaint, she was transferred, and the overall work environment was so unbearable that she had no choice but to quit the job that she loved.

Toxic Environment

Many sexual harassment cases follow this type of pattern where the employees make complaints. The complaints are not sufficiently addressed and then the employees are either transferred, fired, or end up quitting due to the pervasive nature of sexual harassment in the workplace. In this case, the male plaintiff and the other male who witnessed the harassment may be able to serve as witnesses on the female plaintiff’s behalf to provide that the sexual harassment in the workplace was so pervasive and ongoing, creating a hostile work environment. Often, victims of alleged sexual harassment show evidence of mental health problems that stemmed from the sexual harassment at work and the retaliatory acts that affected their ability to do their job after complaining.

Chester County Sexual Harassment Lawyers at Sidney L. Gold & Associates, P.C. Bring Sexual Harassment Claims Against Negligent Employers

Sexual harassment and discrimination can happen in all types of workplace environments. Our Chester County sexual harassment lawyers can evaluate your situation and provide advice on what next steps are available. Health problems, which are related to the sexual harassment can be relevant to your claim. If you have been subjected to sexual harassment and have either complained at work or are considering making a complaint, contact Sidney L. Gold & Associates, P.C. at 215-569-1999 or contact us online for a free case evaluation. With locations in Philadelphia and Pennsauken, New Jersey, we serve the surrounding areas.

EMPLOYMENT LAW PRACTICE AREAS
View All Practices
Sidney L. Gold SuperLawyer 16 years
Top Rated Lawyers Legal Leaders
ASLA 2019 badge
ATA Lifetime
BBB Rating
Best Lawyers Award Badge
Best Lawyers Award Badge
Institute Visionary Circle Badge
Best Employment lawyers in Philadelphia
2019 American Trail Lawyers badge
Lead Counsel Rated
life time achievement
million dollar advocates badge
AV Peer Review Rated
Philly Happening
Top one badge
Silver Client Champion Award 2020
super lawyers badge
Bar Register 2021
Bar Register 2021 Seal
Elite Lawyer Badge
NAOATTY 2021 Distinguished Member Badge
MH Preeminent
Sid Gold Judicial Edition 2022
Sid Gold 2022-Bar Register Preeminent Lawyers
Sid Gold Client Champion 2022

As Seen On

avvo lawyers.com Martindale Justia FindLaw
© 2022 Sidney L. Gold and Associates, P.C. All rights reserved. [ Site Map | Privacy Policy ]

Attorney Advertising Materials. Sidney L. Gold is responsible for the content of this website. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

Website Accessibility: Sidney L. Gold & Associates P.C. is committed to ensuring digital accessibility for people with disabilities. We are continually working to improve the accessibility of all content on our website and applying the relevant accessibility standards.

* The awards and accolades displayed on this website were issued to the attorneys, or the entire law firm by the respective providers of these honors. They are as follows, Avvo Inc., Super Lawyers®, Martindale Hubbell Peer Review Rated, ASLA Top 100 Lawyers, Million Dollar Advocates Forum, Legal Leaders Top Rated Lawyers, Bar Register Preeminent Lawyer, Happening List Winner, BBB Accredited Business, National Association of Distinguished Counsel Top 1 Percent, America's Top 100 Attorneys, The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute for law and policy, Best Lawyers, Lead Counsel Rated, Top Employment Lawyers in Philadelphia, Association of American Trial Lawyers Top 100 and Martindale Hubbell Client Champion Silver. No aspect of these advertisements have been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.