Are You in the Healthcare Field?

Find Out How We Can Help »
[et_social_follow icon_style="slide" icon_shape="rectangle" icons_location="top" col_number="1" outer_color="dark"]
Millions Recovered For Our Clients No Fees Unless We Win

Philly Police Seek Reinstatement After Offensive Facebook Posts

July 1st, 2020

Sidney L. Gold was recently quoted in an article addressing the Philadelphia police officers who wanted their jobs reinstated after punishment due to racist social media posts. In June 2019, racist and violent Facebook posts by police offers were made public and started a wave of protests across the United States. The Plain View Project, a database of public Facebook posts and comments made by current and former police officers, enabled the public to do their own research on what officers are saying in their neighborhoods.

In Philadelphia, many uniformed officers were punished for their online conduct and the content they posted. Now, a year later, those officers who were punished are appealing their discipline through the police union’s arbitration process. The officers who voluntarily left the department are also appealing their punishment, despite the chance of permanent termination.

Due to the demonstrations that occurred in 2019, the Philadelphia Police Department sought to terminate 15 police officers for their online content. Eleven out of the 15 officers resigned or retired instead of facing formal termination; the other officers were given month-long suspensions. All officers involved have filed grievances to try and get their jobs back. A grievance arbitration is a common process for police departments but it is also quite controversial. This process has led to the rehiring and badge returns of fired officers, despite their past wrongdoings. Grievance arbitration has become a topic of conversation as of recent due to the Black Lives Matter movement.

The Federal Order of Police (FOP) argues that the resignations of the police officers from 2019 were forced dismissals. The past Police Commissioner framed the resignations as more effective than terminations because, under Pennsylvania labor law, unionized employees do not usually grieve resignation or retirement. The officers who filed grievances claimed that their actions were a type of constructive discharge, where the only choice was to resign.

Proving this argument in court is extremely difficult. Sidney L. Gold stated that it is very restrictive and that the officers would need to prove their working conditions were intolerable, that they complained to an employer to improve those conditions, and that those efforts failed. The appeal process is still ongoing with many obstacles ahead for the officers who desire to be reinstated. To read more about the investigation and Sidney L. Gold’s legal perspective on the case, click here.

EMPLOYMENT LAW PRACTICE AREAS
View All Practices
Sidney L. Gold SuperLawyer 16 years
Top Rated Lawyers Legal Leaders
ASLA 2019 badge
ATA Lifetime
BBB Rating
Best Lawyers Award Badge
Best Lawyers Award Badge
Institute Visionary Circle Badge
Best Employment lawyers in Philadelphia
2019 American Trail Lawyers badge
Lead Counsel Rated
life time achievement
million dollar advocates badge
AV Peer Review Rated
Philly Happening
Top one badge
Silver Client Champion Award 2020
super lawyers badge
Bar Register 2021
Bar Register 2021 Seal
Elite Lawyer Badge
NAOATTY 2021 Distinguished Member Badge
MH Preeminent
Sid Gold Judicial Edition 2022
Sid Gold 2022-Bar Register Preeminent Lawyers
Sid Gold Client Champion 2022

As Seen On

avvo lawyers.com Martindale Justia FindLaw
© 2022 Sidney L. Gold and Associates, P.C. All rights reserved. [ Site Map | Privacy Policy ]

Attorney Advertising Materials. Sidney L. Gold is responsible for the content of this website. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

Website Accessibility: Sidney L. Gold & Associates P.C. is committed to ensuring digital accessibility for people with disabilities. We are continually working to improve the accessibility of all content on our website and applying the relevant accessibility standards.

* The awards and accolades displayed on this website were issued to the attorneys, or the entire law firm by the respective providers of these honors. They are as follows, Avvo Inc., Super Lawyers®, Martindale Hubbell Peer Review Rated, ASLA Top 100 Lawyers, Million Dollar Advocates Forum, Legal Leaders Top Rated Lawyers, Bar Register Preeminent Lawyer, Happening List Winner, BBB Accredited Business, National Association of Distinguished Counsel Top 1 Percent, America's Top 100 Attorneys, The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute for law and policy, Best Lawyers, Lead Counsel Rated, Top Employment Lawyers in Philadelphia, Association of American Trial Lawyers Top 100 and Martindale Hubbell Client Champion Silver. No aspect of these advertisements have been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.